Reconstructing the Proto-Polynesian Terminology: Kinship Terminologies as Evolving Logical Structures

نویسنده

  • Dwight Read
چکیده

The kin term product calculations used by culture-bearers to compute kin relationships from kin terms without reference to genealogy are the basis for the structure of a kinship terminology and its underlying generative logic. The details of that logic account for differences in the structural forms for kinship terminologies. The structural form of the Polynesian kinship terminologies, like that of other classificatory (i.e., bifurcate merging) terminologies, derives from a structural logic in which a sibling term is a generating element. When a sibling term is a generating element, differences in the patterning of sibling terms arise from different ways in which structural logic for the reciprocity of sibling terms is implemented. These differences in implementation of sibling term reciprocity are used to construct, in analogy with a language tree, a kinship tree based on the different structures for sibling terms in the Polynesian terminologies. The kinship tree has two root structural forms for sibling terms. One structural form matches that for sibling terms in the Anuta, East Futuna, West Futuna, Luangiua, Nanumea, Takuu, Tikopia, and Tuvalu kinship terminologies. The other matches the structural form for sibling terms in the Pukapuka and Pileni terminologies. In contrast, the Proto-Polynesian terminology derived using the methods of historical linguistics has a root structural form for the sibling terms matching that found among the East Polynesian language kinship terminologies. These differences in analytical results are discussed and a possible way to reconcile them is developed. Introduction In his 1991 Marett Memorial Lecture at Exeter College, Thomas Trautmann observed that even though “anthropology has something quite distinctive to say about human history,” nonetheless “Social anthropology has drawn back from active construction of schemata of human social development over very long duration” even though it has not rejected the “developmental concepts ... that gave Draft of July 23, 2011. Do not quote without permission of author.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Formal Analysis of Kinship Terminologies and Its Relationship to What Constitutes Kinship (complete Text)

The goal of this paper is to relate formal analysis of kinship terminologies to a better understanding of who, culturally, are defined as our kin. Part I of the paper begins with a brief discussion as to why neither of the two claims: (1) kinship terminologies primarily have to do with social categories and (2) kinship terminologies are based on classification of genealogically specified relati...

متن کامل

Your place or mine? A phylogenetic comparative analysis of marital residence in Indo-European and Austronesian societies.

Accurate reconstruction of prehistoric social organization is important if we are to put together satisfactory multidisciplinary scenarios about, for example, the dispersal of human groups. Such considerations apply in the case of Indo-European and Austronesian, two large-scale language families that are thought to represent Neolithic expansions. Ancestral kinship patterns have mostly been infe...

متن کامل

Formal analysis of kinship terminologies and its relationship to what constitutes kinship

The goal of this paper is to relate formal analysis of kinship terminologies to a better understanding of who, culturally, are defined as our kin. Part I of the paper begins with a brief discussion as to why neither of the two claims: (1) kinship terminologies primarily have to do with social categories and (2) kinship terminologies are based on classification of genealogically specified relati...

متن کامل

Indo-european Kinship Terminologies in Europe: Trajectories of Change

This is a study of kin terms and kinship terminologies in Indo-European (IE) languages. There is, of course, no shortage of such studies already (e.g. Delbrück 1889, Hocart 1928, Galton 1957, Friedrich 1966, Szemerényi 1977, Kullanda 2002), which go back to the nineteenth century. By and large, however, most of them are concerned with reconstructing terms historically, right back to proto-IE, a...

متن کامل

Cultural evolution is not equivalent to Darwinian evolution

Darwinian evolution, defined as evolution arising from selection based directly on the properties of individuals, does not account for cultural constructs providing the organizational basis of human societies. The difficulty with linking Darwinian evolution to structural properties of cultural constructs is exemplified with kinship terminologies, a cultural construct that structures and delinea...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011